Jackson Clan Mistreating Debbie Rowe?

More details about how Michael’s family is choosing to cope with his death

By Ted Casablanca Jul 08, 2009 3:30 PMTags
Debbie RowePedro Andrade/PacificCoastNews.com

Michael Jackson's early exit has left his loved ones devastated. Not only because they mourn the loss of their brother, father and son, but because Michael's sudden departure left his family, too, without the opportunity to work past a lot of questions they had prior to his death.

"Michael and his family had many unresolved issues," dishes a source über-tight with the Jackson fam. "He has left them with a lot of unanswered questions, particularly about why he fell so out of touch with most of them."

We're told this has left an anger-fueled Jackson family, who are so grief-stricken, they're taking it out on one person in particular: Debbie Rowe.

"They hate, hate, hate her," the M.J. insider stresses. "Since Michael's gone, it's easiest to make Debbie a scapegoat for all of their leftover problems."

We're told that the Jackson family rather despised the relationship she had with M.J.

Although no one can fully understand the relationship Michael and Debbie had, D.R. isn't just some baby maker, sorry. "[Debbie] adored Michael," says our Jackson insider. "She would have done anything for him, and obviously, she did."

Gotta say Rowe's still the mother of M.J.'s two children. And now that these kids are fatherless, do they really need to be poisoned about the one parent they have left? I mean, is that what all their aunties and uncles and grandparents should really be doing?

No matter how you look at Rowe and Michael's arrangement, people should think about these kids first. What kind of message is the Jackson family sending if they choose to isolate their own blood?

Sure, the whole parental situation may not have been ideal, but at a time like this, do you think the casting out of Debbie, who spent yesterday tending to her horses instead of her own kids (as she was so clearly made unwelcome at the memorial) is in the best interest of the children?