Clay Aiken vs. Adam Lambert: He Made My Ears Bleed

Aiken blasts Idol runner-up, calling him "contrived, awful and slightly frightening"; claims judges had "obvious bias"

By Gina Serpe May 22, 2009 5:50 PMTags
E! Placeholder Image

Well, me-ow.

Don't count Clay Aiken among those upset by Adam Lambert's second-place finish on American Idol. Or, for that matter, among those who can be bothered—or care enough—to even watch the show.

There's apparently no love lost between Ruben Studdard's second banana and Kris Allen's, evidenced by an entry posted yesterday on Aiken's subscriber-only-accessible blog.

"For the record…I couldn't be happier about the way AI ended this year," Aiken wrote, per Defamer. "I only turn the show on once a season, and only to see what the set looks like each year.

"This year, I happened to turn it during the minute that Adam Lambert was singing 'Ring of Fire' and, at that moment, thought my ears would bleed. Contrived, awful and slightly frightening!"

He then delivered his final blow: "Just not my cup of tea at all. To each his own."

Granted, Aiken admitted that he never had the good fortune or even desire to assess Allen's pipes, and acknowledged that some of his most trusted pals told him Lambert's performances were usually "great," but he believes the battle ultimately came down to likability.

And per Aiken, like it or not, a vote for Kris was just as much a vote against Adam.

"From what I saw, Kris seemed likable," he wrote. "That's not to say that Adam isn't just as likable as anyone…maybe more so…I don't know.

"Until the finale, folks are voting for the contestant that they want to see continue," he went on. "But, I believe on that last night, the dynamic changes. No longer forced to choose one person that they want to see win, the audience can effectively vote AGAINST the person that they don't want to see win."

In that way—and that's the only way he's willing to go on record about—Aiken claims he and Lambert are very much alike. However, while he and Studdard were evenly matched and equally worthy, he believes the balance was off this year and that voters were reacting to a season in which there was "an obvious bias."

"Not even having watched the show, I can tell you that I was WELL aware of the bias from the judges as to who should win. In my opinion, that is awfully unattractive. I don't think I am alone.

"I think many were turned off by the blatant favoritism shows towards one contestant…And, at the same time, I think they voted AGAINST an American Idol that has, for four years now, been more about the slick productions and polished contestants than it has been about finding the raw talent that it did in its first three seasons.

"Enough with the pretention. More Rubens, more Clays, more Fantasias and Tamyras and Kellys please."

Wonder what Carrie Underwood, Jordin Sparks, Taylor Hicks and David Cook ever did to him.

And lest critics think Aiken is just bitter on account of his not taking home the Idol title, think again.

"My faith has always been in the voters. I think they have gotten it right every year (mine included). It's now up to American Idol to decide if it will finally REALLY listen to the folks that keep it on the air."

Guess that means the duets album is out.

Poll

Clay vs. Adam Smackdown Poll

Adam may already be showing more grace in his defeat, but who's the better Idol also-ran?
Adam; he's got more talent in his nail-polished, blinged-out finger than Aiken has in his body
38%
Clay; he's outlasted most of the American Idol winners and his longevity will long outlast Lambert's
62%

(Originally published May 22, 2009, at 9:15 a.m. PT)

______

Follow us on Twitter @eonline and get our free iPhone app