Splinter

A few scenes in this indie horror flick might get under your skin, but the rest of the time you'll be bored out of your mind.

By Alex Markerson Oct 30, 2008 8:22 PMTags
Splinter, Paulo CostanzoMagnolia Pictures

Review in a Hurry: A few scenes in this indie horror flick might get under your skin, but the rest of the time you'll be bored out of your mind.

The Bigger Picture: Enough to make you wince, not enough to make you cry: A few clinical that's-gotta-hurt musings are really all Splinter is good for. The ingredients are all there: a small, virtually unknown cast, a remote location, a nasty critter—but the seasoning is all off.

The creature that drives the action is a—well, it's an it, a substance that hijacks living tissue and uses it to hunt down still more prey, somewhere on a continuum between a thing and a blob. It is, fortunately for the reluctant heroes trapped inside a rural gas station, about as dumb as a rock.

Too bad, then, that the leads in director Toby Wilkins' film are sharp enough to let fly with some sardonic one-liners in the face of danger, but get hit with a severe case of the movie stupids when they discover the critter's major weakness, concocting a cockamamy plan when a simple one would do. 

It's a surprise to learn that Wilkins comes from the visual effects end of the industry; shots of the creature are in conspicuously short supply, and in a way that's the kiss of death for a flick like this: Early on you figure out that Splinter is going to be too cheap of a project to really bring the scares, and it's not like you were coming for the scenery.

The 180—a Second Opinion: Might be a good time if you go in rooting for the poor, misunderstood fungus monster. Or if you'd consider lifting from The Addams Family the height of horror genius.