Dr. Paul White

Reed Saxon/Getty Images

UPDATE 4:05 p.m.: Court adjourned for the day and White will resume his testimony Friday at 8:45 a.m.

UPDATE 3:45 p.m.: Both Judge Michael Pastor and defense attorney Michael Flanagan accidentally referred to White as "Dr. Shafer" on more than one occasion. White joked that he needed a name tag and said, "I take it as a compliment." As for the use of propofol, White said it "could be the best possible agent for monitored anesthesia care."

UPDATE 2:15 p.m.: Anesthesiologist Dr. Paul White, said to be the defense's star witness, took the stand to kick off the afternoon session. He testified that he started researching propofol in 1983, six years before it was approved by the FDA, and that he has known prosecution witness Dr. Steve Shafer for 30 years.

"My thoughts were, I wasn't sure I wanted to get involved in a high-profile case involving the death of an icon," White said. "I am not a public person, I don't enjoy all the attention. I agreed to review materials for [the defense]. I was kind of perplexed that Dr. Murray was infusing propofol. It wasn't obvious to me."

The dosage that Murray said he gave Jackson should not have killed the singer, White said.

UPDATE 12:00 p.m.: During cross-examination, tensions between Waldman and Walgren reached a peak, with the D.A. finally barking out (to the amusement of the smiling Jackson family, again sitting in the front row of the courtroom), "Is there a reason why it's so hard for you to answer my questions, but it's so easy for you to answer Mr. Chernoff's?"

He then denied that he had any knowledge that Murray was Jackson's private physician in the month of his death, repeatedly stating that he did not pay attention to what was happening in the public arena. The response resulted in the frustrated prosecutor blasting the doctor, reminding him that in his earlier testimony, he had no problem diagnosing Jackson as an addict, a conclusion that could only have come from a close study of what was happening in the same public arena he claims to have no knowledge of. Testimony will resume at 2 p.m. PT.

UPDATE 10:30 a.m.: Addiction expert Dr. Robert Waldman was first up on the stand, and was immediately asked about the addictive powers of the sedatives given to Jackson. "I don't recall ever seeing a Demerol addiction," he told the defense, adding that if someone was withdrawing from the drug, they would suffer "dire sweating, increased heart rate, muscular aches and pains, nausea, restlessness and insomnia."

After looking at the dermatological records of Dr. Arnold Klein, Waldman said that the pop star had been receiving "above average dosages" of Demerol, which implied "that he is no longer getting the therapeutic effect from the prior dosages...There is evidence he was dependent on Demerol. He was probably addicted to the opiods."

During cross-examination, the prosecutionn said that Demerol was not present in Jackson's toxicology results and when pressed by D.A. David Walgren repeatedly to answer whether he would diagnose Jackson as addicted to Demerol based on those results, he finally relented, "probably no."

"If a patient asks you to administer a dangerous drug, a drug that could be harmful," Walgren asked, "would you refuse to administer that drug to the patient?"

To which Waldman replied, "Absolutely."

This is it? While truly anything could happen, in all likelihood—yes.

Just two defense witnesses remain in the Michael Jackson manslaughter trial, and at the rate Conrad Murray's team has been blowing through them, it shouldn't take too long (those pesky schedules permitting) to wrap this up. Today's court session is presumably back to a full day after yesterday's recessed after just a couple hours because one of the defense's witnesses had a scheduling conflict and wasn't able to take the stand.

The final witnesses for Murray are doctors, experts in both addiction and propofol (Murray was reminded yesterday that he could testify in his own defense, but is not expected to do so). At any rate, should their testimony not last the whole day through, closing arguments still would not take place until next week, as the judge already stipulated that attorneys would be given the weekend to prep their final statements.

As always, E! Online will be livestreaming today's proceedings, starting at 8:45 a.m. PT.

(Originally published on Oct. 27, 2011 at 8:40 a.m. PT)

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Share

We and our partners use cookies on this site to improve our service, perform analytics, personalize advertising, measure advertising performance, and remember website preferences. By using the site, you consent to these cookies. For more information on cookies including how to manage your consent visit our Cookie Policy.