Ask the Answer B!tch

She's here to help

Is CSI more realistic than Law & Order?

I'm a fan of both CSI and Law & Order. However, the two seem to contradict each other. On CSI, the cases are investigated primarily by the crime scene investigators, and the police are simply background drones. On Law & Order, it's vice versa. Which show is more accurate?
—Kerri, Venice, California

The B!tch Replies:  Let's get America's most burning question out of the way first. Apparently, many real-life crime fighters do have the same rapier wit as William Petersen. Granted, their bons mots are not immediately followed by a jagged flourish of geriat-rock, but still, the gents in blue can be quite clever.

"Let's put it this way," law enforcement consultant Mike Witzgall tells this B!tch, "if a [forensics] person came out to a crime scene and started ordering me around, honestly, there would soon be two crime scenes."

See what I mean? Classic.

Generally, consultants tell this B!tch, Law & Order wins in the accuracy department. Why? Where do we start? Unlike Petersen's crack team of far-roving justice hotties, real CSI types generally do not leave the lab without being summoned by cops. Instead, Witzgall says, forensic crime-scene workers are more like rare crypt creatures.

"They're like vampires," Witzgall quips.

Let's see, what else? Well, despite what Marg Helgenberger might like you to believe, CSIs generally do not grill suspects. That's Gary Sinise's job.

Nor, generally, do CSIs hunt down murderers using little more than a Glock and a pair of $200 jeans from wardrobe.

Speaking of Helgenberger's CSI character:

"In Las Vegas, they've got a morality clause for people who become sworn officers—people who get a badge and a gun—and it's very doubtful that a former pole dancer's going to be given that power," Witzgall says. "In that lifestyle, a lot of people consort with felons, there's a lot of drug use—and look at her background. She's the daughter of a mafioso type, and she's carrying a badge and a gun."

Yes, Mike, but she can also bust a bad guy in really tight pants. That counts for something, right?

View Next Articles

2 Comments

Now loading...

Add Your Comment!

Guests

E! Online members

Register | Forgot password?

Play nice and have fun. And please, no HTML tags or special characters including [&*#()!@$].
You've got 1000 characters left.

Post Comment
Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.

Podcasts

Is R.Pattz Really the Next Keanu Reeves?

  • Yes, but Kristen Stewart is not the next Natalie Portman. All this and more in my new weekly podcast!

For real, Taylor Lautner = Matt Damon

  • Pretty much an all-Twilight/New Moon episode this week. With some strippers thrown in. All in our weekly podcast.

Why Did Rihanna Wait So Long?

  • Also: How "This Is It" duped you, why celebs lie and what made tweens call Miley Cyrus a bad influence! All in our weekly podcast.

Where Did Gerard Butler Come From, Anyway?

  • Also: Aniston, Selena Gomez, Gitmo! All in our weekly podcast.
Got a query about how Hollywood works? Ask it!

Get Your E! News Now

Text ENEWS to 4INFO (44636) for daily celeb news alerts

Standard messaging rates apply.

Did you know you can grab smokin' hot E! Online news, review and gossip through our RSS service?

New to RSS feeds? Learn more >>

Birthdate:

Enter your full birthdate:

  • Opt in for Breaking News Alerts

has been subscribed to the E! News Now Newsletter.

To change your settings, go to your preferences.

Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.