Does Scream 4 Signal the Death of the Sequel?
Dimension
With the less than awesome box office of Scream 4, should we believe that reboots are now more successful ventures than sequels?
—Dan C., via Facebook
In a word, yes. The opening weekend for Scream 4 scared up a so-so $18 million. But does that mean that people would rather see the birth of a baby Ghostface than the ongoing adventures of a geriatric Ghostface. Well:
Yes.
"If Scream 4 proved anything other than that irony is on its deathbed, it's that horror reboots have a better chance of survival in the current cinematic marketplace than continuing sagas," says box office analyst Jeff Bock of Exhibitor Relations. "If there is a Scream 5, expect it to be re-titled Scream, and don't expect David Arquette, Courteney Cox or Neve Campbell to return unless it's in a cameo—in the form of a body bag."
Need more proof? Numbers don't lie. Lately we've had reboots of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, A Nightmare on Elm Street and Friday the 13th—and all of them just killed Scream 4 in terms of earnings. Massacre took in $28 million in its opening weekend and has earned $80 million domestically thus far; Nightmare enjoyed a $32 million opening weekend and boasts $63 million domestic dollars under Freddy's belt; and the new Friday the 13th earned $40 million in its first Friday and Saturday and Sunday. (It's earned about $65 mil so far.)
In contrast, Bock expects the new Scream installment to earn, "tops," $40 million.
If you love reboots, I have more good news: Universal's The Thing and Disney's Fright Night are both being rebooted as well.
Need more Hollywood intelligence? It's all right here in a brand new Answer B!tch podcast!

54 Comments
-
Show the next 1 - 0 of 54 comments
Now loading...